A recent blog article, "Texas School Board of Gym Teachers" written by William Gee presents the continuous debate between Science and Religion teachings in the classroom. Science and technology have become the most ubiquitous of human creations, changing how we perceive our world and shaping the way we live. Science serves our innate need to know, helping us to deal effectively in some measure with forces of nature. For many, it provides meaning and understanding in facing life's realities and challenges. Science and Religion have their respective reasons for being. Each stand alone as independent human endeavors, having their own culture, body of knowledge, processes and procedures of verifying the truth, and ways of serving humanity. They do not have the same viewpoints about the nature of the world or agree about how the truth is perceived or confirmed.
Texas School Board of Education's debate regarding the teachings of Science versus Religion in the classroom is merely a political issue. Why would scientists be more qualified to critique the politics of the American classroom than, say, photography or car racing? For that matter, why would prominent TV evangelists be qualified to tell Americans what scientific content is appropriate for our children?
There's no question that there's battle for the minds of American children, no question that Creationism belongs in Sunday School and not high school Biology, and no question that we get our fair share of seriously disturbed hate mail because we say: the evidence is in. Just like the article stated, "The Earth is about 4.5 billion years old," early hominids go back over a million year, and homo sapiens emerged a hundred thousand years ago spreading to Europe around 40,000 years ago. We get no thanks for suggesting that, if you were going to teach Creationism, you would teach it as part of a survey of world religions, many of which have their own theories of creation, being sure to include the views of Buddhism, Judaism and Islam.
What is taught in American public schools is a political decision, and if you don't like it, you can teach your kids yourself, or put them in a private school that subscribes to your personal views. There are many valid reasons for doing so, but there are no valid reasons for trying to require children of other parents to absorb your views too. Instead of wasting time debating "Science vs. Religion," perhaps we need to stop, step back, and take a fresh look.
I don't see a conflict between Science and Religion, per se. What I see are global political conflicts between political demagogues acting in the name of the religions they claim to represent, but don't. If Americans can pause to rue the institutionalized destruction of "different" native American beliefs, values and culture, then surely we owe ourselves, as modern-day Americans, the same courtesy.
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Monday, July 25, 2011
Let's Help Raise Higher Education Standards
Raising college education to new heights should be one of the primary goals to help raise our economy. Much of what we're hearing about Texas' higher education system is nothing more than a disruption from our focus and battle we must fight and win. Reforming higher education is not about being left or right or conservative or liberal. It is bout helping Texas students contribute to the future prosperity of our state.
Lawmakers, colleges and universities and business community must work together to help reform Texas higher education. We must drive the kind of reform that puts more Texas students on the path to higher education and help them earn a meaningful degree.
We do not immediately address the funding and structural reforms necessary to improve our graduation rates and graduate more Texans with advanced degrees or certificates. With this in mind, Texas repeatedly earns the top spot among ranking for business climate and job creation.
Just over 30 percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 hold an associate's degree or higher. By 2018, the Business Roundtable estimates that 63 percent of new replacement jobs in the United States will require at least a bachelor's degree. State lawmakers have reformed a committee to defend our universities against real perceived threats to higher education.
We must do a better job representing the people, especially taxpayers who fund public universities, students who attend them and job creators. If only about half of Texas students who enroll in a university today will eventually graduate, we cannot expect to stay competitive in business and job creation.
We should ensure accountability of our tax dollars by doing more to address completion rates. We should help raise higher education standards by hoping that both sides of the "seven distractions" debate will come to an agreement that will help benefit Texas higher education.
Lawmakers, colleges and universities and business community must work together to help reform Texas higher education. We must drive the kind of reform that puts more Texas students on the path to higher education and help them earn a meaningful degree.
We do not immediately address the funding and structural reforms necessary to improve our graduation rates and graduate more Texans with advanced degrees or certificates. With this in mind, Texas repeatedly earns the top spot among ranking for business climate and job creation.
Just over 30 percent of Texans ages 25 to 34 hold an associate's degree or higher. By 2018, the Business Roundtable estimates that 63 percent of new replacement jobs in the United States will require at least a bachelor's degree. State lawmakers have reformed a committee to defend our universities against real perceived threats to higher education.
We must do a better job representing the people, especially taxpayers who fund public universities, students who attend them and job creators. If only about half of Texas students who enroll in a university today will eventually graduate, we cannot expect to stay competitive in business and job creation.
We should ensure accountability of our tax dollars by doing more to address completion rates. We should help raise higher education standards by hoping that both sides of the "seven distractions" debate will come to an agreement that will help benefit Texas higher education.
Monday, July 18, 2011
Help Aid Texan Job Market
In a recent editorial article published in Austin American Statesman on July 18th, Governor Rick Perry is helping aid many Texans achieve more jobs in the state. It was recently announced that Electronic Arts is opening a branch of EA Sports game division in Austin, which would help increase 150 jobs and 150 contract positions.
Electronic Arts decided to pursue their business with the help of Governor Rick Perry's involvement and special incentives the Legislature created. This company will attract jobs and projects in television, film and video game industries. They are also offering 5 to 15 percent payments for eligible spending and some sales tax exemptions for eligible purchases.
Due to the recent budget curs in the school districts, many teachers lost their jobs. EA Sports will hopefully help many unemployed teachers acquire jobs. It is unfortunate that many teachers are now unemployed due to the recent budget cuts. The growing unemployment rate of the state will hopefully decrease with the help of this company. Governor Rick Perry is very proactive in trying to make sure Texas job market stays afloat and many unemployed citizens gain jobs. This is one of the reasons why Governor Perry is very popular among Texas citizens. He tries his very best to hep unemployed people attain jobs.
I truly believe that with the help of Electronic Sports Company, many unemployed Texans will be able to get jobs to help them financially. This economic downfall is just really hurting a lot of people. We need more Governors like Rick Perry to be more involved in the financial welfare of our fellow citizens. Even if you are not a governor, everyone is able to help make this state a better place to live by helping each other. Governor Perry sets a perfect example for our fellow citizens. Increase in job market will help boost unemployment rate in Texas. With this in mind, let's help each other! Go Texas!!!
Electronic Arts decided to pursue their business with the help of Governor Rick Perry's involvement and special incentives the Legislature created. This company will attract jobs and projects in television, film and video game industries. They are also offering 5 to 15 percent payments for eligible spending and some sales tax exemptions for eligible purchases.
Due to the recent budget curs in the school districts, many teachers lost their jobs. EA Sports will hopefully help many unemployed teachers acquire jobs. It is unfortunate that many teachers are now unemployed due to the recent budget cuts. The growing unemployment rate of the state will hopefully decrease with the help of this company. Governor Rick Perry is very proactive in trying to make sure Texas job market stays afloat and many unemployed citizens gain jobs. This is one of the reasons why Governor Perry is very popular among Texas citizens. He tries his very best to hep unemployed people attain jobs.
I truly believe that with the help of Electronic Sports Company, many unemployed Texans will be able to get jobs to help them financially. This economic downfall is just really hurting a lot of people. We need more Governors like Rick Perry to be more involved in the financial welfare of our fellow citizens. Even if you are not a governor, everyone is able to help make this state a better place to live by helping each other. Governor Perry sets a perfect example for our fellow citizens. Increase in job market will help boost unemployment rate in Texas. With this in mind, let's help each other! Go Texas!!!
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Why doesn't a majority of Texans vote?
Texas has one of the lowest voter turnout rates in the United States. Although many reasons are given to explain these low standards such as poverty, lack of education, strange political structures, and past discrimination movements affecting today's voters, there is still no definite reason why voters in the state of Texas do not vote.
In a recent editorial article published on July 13, 2011 in American Statesman, Travis County Clerk Dana DeBeauvoir proposed the creation of "vote centers" that would allow everyone to vote at any polling place in the county. She mentioned that "vote centers" will allow voters greater convenience, eliminate the confusion of where to vote on Election Day, reduce problems with less-than-ideal polling locations and reduce the number of elementary schools that have to used for polling places. Texas secretary of state has until Aug. 15 to approve of deny the proposal.
In my opinion, the proposal of "vote centers" is a good thing. This will hopefully help increase the number of voters in Texas. Many people end up not voting, such as myself because of the inconvenience and the hassle that goes along with voting. If the "vote centers" will help eliminate all these issues, Texans will most likely exercise their voting rights. No matter why the voter of Texas does not participate, however, the fact still stands that Texans need to vote.
In a recent editorial article published on July 13, 2011 in American Statesman, Travis County Clerk Dana DeBeauvoir proposed the creation of "vote centers" that would allow everyone to vote at any polling place in the county. She mentioned that "vote centers" will allow voters greater convenience, eliminate the confusion of where to vote on Election Day, reduce problems with less-than-ideal polling locations and reduce the number of elementary schools that have to used for polling places. Texas secretary of state has until Aug. 15 to approve of deny the proposal.
In my opinion, the proposal of "vote centers" is a good thing. This will hopefully help increase the number of voters in Texas. Many people end up not voting, such as myself because of the inconvenience and the hassle that goes along with voting. If the "vote centers" will help eliminate all these issues, Texans will most likely exercise their voting rights. No matter why the voter of Texas does not participate, however, the fact still stands that Texans need to vote.
Sunday, July 10, 2011
Obama's Gas Tax Break
In July 2011, President Barack Obama proposed a massive Democrat-sponsored tax cut. He is proposing a 50 percent gas tax break. Obama administration would like to require that new American cars and light trucks average 56.2 miles per gallon by 2025. Click here to read the full article.
According to the automotive industry, vehicle prices might drastically increase that consumers presumably ends up keeping their cars longer. Currently, the standard average is 28 mpg. By 2016, this is already set to increase by 34.1 mpg according to the agreement reached by Obama administration and the car manufacturers two years ago.
The idea of increasing the mpg in cars will be truly beneficial to everyone because this will drastically cut taxes in half. People will be able to save more money or use it for other means. The only downfall for this proposal is that the prices of cars and gasoline might possibly increase. If this happens, this just basically defeats the purpose of cutting taxes in half and helping people save money. If we can keep the prices of gasoline the way it is and the price of the new car is reasonable, then Obama's proposal will definitely help everyone financially.
According to the automotive industry, vehicle prices might drastically increase that consumers presumably ends up keeping their cars longer. Currently, the standard average is 28 mpg. By 2016, this is already set to increase by 34.1 mpg according to the agreement reached by Obama administration and the car manufacturers two years ago.
The idea of increasing the mpg in cars will be truly beneficial to everyone because this will drastically cut taxes in half. People will be able to save more money or use it for other means. The only downfall for this proposal is that the prices of cars and gasoline might possibly increase. If this happens, this just basically defeats the purpose of cutting taxes in half and helping people save money. If we can keep the prices of gasoline the way it is and the price of the new car is reasonable, then Obama's proposal will definitely help everyone financially.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)